Saturday, October 18, 2008

Presidential Deal Breakers


Two years ago, my husband and I decided it was time to trade-in our hip and trendy SUV for the ultimate status symbol - a minivan. (Can you detect the sarcasm?) Well, for practical purposes, we decided to go the minivan route, and I have to admit it's my favorite car I've ever had - definitely a good choice on our part. It may not be hip or trendy, but its practical comfort outweighs any benefits we ever got from our SUV.

Before buying, we took our time comparing makes and models until we decided exactly what we wanted. After searching online inventories of dealers throughout the state, we finally found one that had the exact model we were looking for in stock. I certainly was elated to have finally located a vehicle with all the bells and whistles we wanted, but there was one more thing I needed to know - what color was it? See, Toyota has this awful color called Silver Pine Mica. It's a nauseating green/gold/silver blend - if that makes any sense. Actually, it doesn't, which is why it's so hideous. According to the salesman, it really is a controversial color. People either love it and ask for it by name, or they despise it like me.

So, you can see where I'm going with this, right? Even though after a long search I had located a van with all the options I wanted, if it had been covered with Silver Pine Mica paint, it would have been an absolute deal breaker. That color was so appalling to me, I just couldn't overlook it even with all the other desirable features.

So, how does this relate to presidential politics? Well, I've been paying attention to this election very closely and to the opinions of Christians who are on both sides of the spectrum politically. There are many Christians who will be casting their vote for Barack Obama next month because they agree with his stance on the war, education, health care and his economic policy of "helping the little guy", as well as his promise to increase aid to poverty-stricken countries - just to name a few examples. I can certainly understand how these ideas may resonate with Christians as they seek to undo the many injustices they see in the world. The only problem is that in order to support Barack Obama, a Christian has to ignore the Silver Pine Mica paint job: his overwhelming support of abortion and the vote he cast against the ban on partial-birth abortion, which is nothing less than infanticide. (If you don't know what partial-birth abortion is, do a google search. It will shock and outrage you.)

James tells us to look after widows and orphans - specifically because these people were helpless and utterly dependent on the compassion of others. In the male-dominated society of that era, a husbandless woman and a fatherless child had no voice and no way of conducting business or earning a living. I think it is reasonable to say that the heart of James' message is to look after those who cannot help themselves. Who is more helpless and innocent than an unborn child? No one.

Christians who support Obama might be thinking people like me are so singularly-focused and narrow-minded and wonder how I can be so "obsessed" with one issue. After all, aren't there other issues that matter? Sure there are, but the amount of money we spend on our education system doesn't matter to a child who's never allowed to live. Aborted babies will never have the chance to benefit from Obama's economic policies or grow up to be doers of justice in their communities. Oh, and here's the kicker, a government health care plan is meaningless to a child who's life is taken from her before she can ever see the pediatrician.

No presidential candidate is perfect, but when a candidate supports abortion - including partial-birth abortion - then that's a deal breaker for me. I know the Christians who support Obama do so with good intentions, wanting to express God's love and grace and to undo the perception that Christians are judgemental and intolerant, so they vote as social liberals. Let's follow that premise to it's logical conclusion. Suppose we, as a nation, consistently elected socially liberal candidates. In twenty years, what would our country look like? We would probably have even easier abortions, gay marriage legal nationwide, a decline in traditional two parent families, more government dependence, and the church would be even less relevant than it is today. Who needs the charity and compassion of churches in our communities when the government takes care of everyone? Sure, maybe Christians will no longer be viewed as judgemental and intolerant because they won't even be noticed.

This experiment has already been tried. Go to Europe and see for yourself.

No comments:

Post a Comment