Friday, March 28, 2008
The Stuttering Brain
Those of you who read my blog regularly (if indeed any of you exist) may have noticed that I've recently added a list of books I'm reading. One book, in particular, stands out as different among the rest in my list: The Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention: A Clinician's Guide by Mark Onslow. It is a textbook detailing the Lidcombe Method for treating stuttering in preschool-aged children. I am particularly interested in this because my 5 year old son has struggled greatly with stuttering, and the exact cause of stuttering is still a mystery to this day. There are many theoretical approaches to dealing with stuttering, but all of these are based on presumptive theories relating to the assumed causes of stuttering. Lidcombe is an atheoretical method for treating stuttering. That is to say - the method is not based upon a theory as to the cause of stuttering. It is simply based on clinical research regarding methods that are proven successful in eliminating stuttering in young children - regardless of the cause.
The Lidcombe approach, although it has been thoroughly researched and shown to be very successful with children under the age of 6, is not the typical stuttering treatment a child would receive here in the United States. Only a small number of clinicians here in the U.S. use this approach. Lidcombe was developed primarily in Australia, and is a popular choice for clinicians in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and the United Kingdom. It is a bit radical in it's direct approach, yet it is very simple to implement. It is pure operant conditioning, based upon B.F. Skinner's model of reward, punishment and extinction. With Lidcombe, to summarize briefly(read the book to really learn how to use it), the parent (the clinician simply teaches the parent how to implement the therapy, and then subsequently attains objective measures of treatment progress) in both structured and non-structured conversation offers the child acknowledgment and praise when statements are uttered fluently (i.e. stutter-free) and acknowledges the "bumps" when a child stutters unambiguously, followed by a request to try the statement again. One key factor in making this pleasant for the child is that the positive verbal contingencies must outnumber the negative at least 5:1. This whole idea of directly addressing the stutter with a child flies in the face of many past passive approaches, which were to never acknowledge or address the issue with the child for fear it will make them self-conscious and therefore struggle all the more. In fact, many experts thought the idea of operant conditioning for stuttering was completely abhorrent when the research first began in this area. Yet, for some unknown reason, it works! Perhaps very young children have enough brain plasticity to figure out on their own how to control the stutter once they are encouraged to do so.
Here in the US, one is more likely to receive treatment that is based somewhat on the demands and capacities model - changing conversational and environmental stressors to promote fluency - as well as fluency shaping techniques - teaching stutterers to elongate vowels and and speak with relaxed, slow speech. These techniques have shown success with stutterers, but there are quite a few who are not helped by these methods of treatment. Of the number of children who spontaneously develop stuttering in the preschool years, a full 20% will never recover - despite therapy - and will go on to become adult stutterers. Boys are more often affected than girls, and the risk for boys to become lifelong stutterers is 4 times greater than that for girls. Many of the 80% who recover, do so spontaneously without therapy. That indicates that the failure rate for therapy is much greater than 20%. As the mother of a 5 year old boy who stutters, I know the odds are not necessarily in his favor, but I refuse to give up and settle for one approach that only has shown limited success. I am committed to learning all I can about the supposed causes of stuttering, and I plan to implement this Lidcombe operant therapy at home while my son still receives more traditional therapy once a week at our local elementary school.
Another area in which I plan to do more research and reading regarding stuttering help is in the relatively new field of educational kinesiology (Edu-K.) This is the study and application of natural movement experiences to facilitate learning. It focuses on the performance of specific physical activities that activate the brain for optimal storage and retrieval of information. It has been shown to help with ADD, ADHD, Sensory Integration Disorder as well as basic focus and concentration in both children and adults. I theorize that stuttering has both behavioral and physiological components. It only makes sense, then, to try to treat both. I first began to look into this area when I read in a journal article, What Causes Stuttering?, by Christian Buechel and Martin Sommer. The article explains that PET scans and fMRI imaging have shown in multiple studies that the right hemisphere of the brain is hyperactive in adult stutterers when they produce stutter-free speech; wheareas the left hemisphere is more active when producing stuttered speech. This leads to the hypothesis that the right hemisphere language areas try to compensate for a deficit in the left, and that perhaps the 80% of people who recover from stuttering are those who are able to use their right brain hemispheres for language production. This discovery prompted me to ask, "Is there a way to improve right hemisphere functions and cross-communication between the two hemispheres of the brain?" Indeed, there are exercises and activities that have been shown to improve cross-communication between the left and right hemispheres of the brain as well as other aspects of brain function, and I plan to learn more regarding the research in this field. I have a few books I've ordered on the way. I'll update my blog when I learn more.
I've told my husband I am on a mission to help our son overcome his stuttering. He has already shown significant improvement in the past few months - most of it before we started traditional therapy, and I have my theories regarding his seemingly spontaneous improvement. Hopefully, I will have more information to support my theory once I have read more about Edu-K.
For more information and all the cutting-edge theories and research regarding stuttering, check out the blog, The Stuttering Brain, from which I borrowed the title for this entry. I also have included it in my list of blogs on the left-hand column of the page.
Monday, March 24, 2008
No More Nice Girl
I recently read the book, Nice Girls Don't Change The World, by Lynne Hybels. It's a fantastic little book that challenges a notion that many women (particularly those raised in the church) have readily accepted, which is that God requires them to always be a "nice girl" -- living as a people-pleaser and never breaking the mold or ruffling any feathers. This book was born out of Lynne's personal journey of learning to no longer settle for "niceness." Instead, she battled herself out of depression by learning that God wanted her to become a "good woman" and live out His purpose. Here is her definition of a good woman:
The opposite of a nice girl, I learned is a "good woman." Being a good woman means trading the safe, passive, people-pleasing behavior of niceness for the dynamic power of true goodness. It means moving from the weakness and immaturity of girlhood toward the strength and maturity of womanhood.
Whereas a nice girl of any age lives out the script she learned as a child -- a script too often grounded in powerlessness -- a woman acknowledges and accepts her power to change, and grow, and be a force for good in the world.
Whereas a nice girl tends to live according to the will of others, a good woman has only one goal: to discern and live out the will of God.
A good woman knows that her ultimate calling in life is to be part of God's plan for redeeming all things in this sin-touched world.
A good woman knows she cannot be all things to all people, and she may, in fact displease those who think she should just be nice. She is not strident or petty or demanding, but she does live according to conviction. She knows that the Jesus she follows was a revolutionary who never tried to keep everyone happy.
That picture of a good woman made me want to be one. It made me want to grow up and trade the innocuous acceptability of niceness for the world-changing power and passion of true goodness.
Monday, March 17, 2008
What to Do With Jesus
Yesterday was Palm Sunday and the beginning of the Passion Week, which culminates with Easter Sunday, the celebration of Jesus' resurrection from the grave. The week is appropriately given the name "Passion" because it's a time to celebrate God's passion for us! God is passionate about us, but we must decide if our passion also lies with Him.
If you read the various accounts of Jesus' triumphal entry into Jerusalem (Matthew 21, Mark 11, Luke 19, John 12) on what we now celebrate as Palm Sunday, you see how the villagers who greeted him honored him as the King of Kings. They waved palm branches in exaltation and placed their cloaks over his shoulders and upon his donkey as if they were royal robes. Many laid their cloaks across the road, as a royal carpet, honoring their King as he returned to them. They praised him shouting, "Hosanna!" - a greeting reserved for kings returning from war. Jesus was not and never claimed to be an earthly king, yet he is the King of all Kings and Lord of all Creation. The crowds who greeted him on Palm Sunday in Jerusalem worshiped him, and gave him the glory and honor he deserves.
Only a few days had passed before he encountered two entirely different crowds. First, he was brought before the Jewish high priests and the Sanhedrin, the Jewish Council. (Jesus was a Jew, so he lived under their governing authority and was brought to them to be charged with blasphemy, as they had already conspired against him.) When Jesus refused to deny his claim to be the Son of God, they charged him with blasphemy and declared him worthy of execution. They spit upon him, slapped him and mocked him saying, "Prophesy, and tell us who slapped you that time, Messiah!" He then was presented to Pilate, the Roman governor. Pilate addressed the large crowds outside, asking them what he should do with Jesus. Pilate was willing to let Jesus go free because he felt he had committed no crime. However, the crowd yelled, "Crucify him!", and Pilate (being the wimp that he was) handed him over to be crucified, even though he believed Jesus was an innocent man.
So Jesus, in a matter of days, received glory and praise from one crowd of people and rejection from another, yet no matter how he is ever received, he's still the King of Kings. That fact will never change. Everyone who has lived ever since has had to make the same decision as Pilate and the crowds: we all have to decide what to do with Jesus. Either we give Jesus the glory and honor he deserves in our lives, or we can can shake our fist at him and reject him. There's really no in-between. Many people try to find what they feel is the "moderate" approach to Jesus and say they believe he was a great teacher and a good man. But let's face it: a good man and great teacher doesn't claim to be the Son of God if he really isn't, and a liar certainly doesn't submit to death by Roman crucifixion and refuse to deny his false claim. There's really no way he could have been just a good teacher or a good man. Jesus was either a nut, a bold-faced liar or he really was telling the truth. There's just no room for the "good teacher and good man" perspective in there.
Here is a short video, The Jesus Rant, that puts Jesus into historical perspective. It's very brief and well worth the time. Unfortunately, I'm not able to embed it here in my blog, but it can still be viewed by clicking on this link.
Additionally, a great book on the deity of Jesus, is More Than A Carpenter by Josh McDowell. It's a best-seller and was written by a former skeptic.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Eliot
As a mother of two NICU babies, I was moved to tears by this short video about this little baby, Eliot, who was never expected to live. The miracle of his life and the love he received from his parents are two truly beautiful things.
Saturday, March 8, 2008
God is Bigger
Today was a windy day - very windy. I'm talking deck-furniture-flipping-tree-falling windy.
It's always fun to gawk at the trees as they whip back and forth - as long as they stay upright and don't tip over. As I looked out our kitchen window watching the awesome display, I remarked to my husband, "I hope the wind doesn't knock that dead tree down. I wouldn't want it to fall on our house."
Our son, Jamie, had been paying attention to our conversation, as he usually does. He just looked at me and innocently expressed his wonder and amazement. It was as if he had just realized something for the first time. "Mama," he exclaimed, "God is BIGGER than the tree! His hands are WAY up in the sky."
My heart smiled.
Well said, Jamie. God IS bigger.
It's always fun to gawk at the trees as they whip back and forth - as long as they stay upright and don't tip over. As I looked out our kitchen window watching the awesome display, I remarked to my husband, "I hope the wind doesn't knock that dead tree down. I wouldn't want it to fall on our house."
Our son, Jamie, had been paying attention to our conversation, as he usually does. He just looked at me and innocently expressed his wonder and amazement. It was as if he had just realized something for the first time. "Mama," he exclaimed, "God is BIGGER than the tree! His hands are WAY up in the sky."
My heart smiled.
Well said, Jamie. God IS bigger.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)